How it works
Three steps. One real verdict.
John judges 9 roles on his lunch break. Emily uses it to avoid dead-end applications. Here's the exact flow, without product fluff.
Illustrative example — not a real candidate.
John
“9 roles judged in 2 minutes.” Lunch break. Every day.
Emily
“Interview after 3 weeks of silence.” John sent her the link when she got laid off.
Illustrative example — not a real candidate.
John's lunch break, step by stepOpen a role
John opens LinkedIn Jobs on his lunch break. On supported pages, Judjit can read the visible role right there. If the page needs a manual read, he highlights the text and uses Judge selected text.
Or paste a JD on the website if you want the quick verdict first.
We read the real layers
Role family, seniority, delivery context, hard requirements, and your profile evidence. The same signals a hiring manager weighs.
This is judgment, not keyword matching.
You get the verdict
Score, main blocker, strongest fit, and a clear go / no-go read. Enough to decide in seconds whether the role deserves your time.
Full analysis stays in the extension.
What the verdict feels like
The verdict is binary.
Emily judged both of these on day one. One wasted morning saved. One interview found.
Principal Salesforce Architect · Paris
Fit score
Skip this role
Main blocker
10+ years of architecture leadership are required. Your profile is senior functional delivery, not architect track.
Illustrative example — not a real candidate.
Service Cloud Functional Consultant · Paris
Fit score
Worth pursuing
Strong match
Service Cloud delivery and stakeholder transformation align strongly. CPQ depth is the one gap to flag honestly.
Illustrative example — not a real candidate.
Emily: "I would have applied to that architect role. I didn't read it properly. Judjit did."
Emily: "The 78 wrote the message. I sent it that night. Interview Tuesday."
Illustrative example — not a real candidate.
Questions people actually ask
No mystery layer.
Do I need to upload my CV every time?
No. Build your profile once and Judjit reuses it for every verdict — on the web and in the extension. Upload again only when you want to refresh your evidence.
John: "I set my profile up in 6 minutes. That was months ago. Never touched it since."
Why does the score sometimes feel off?
The score is inferred from your profile evidence. If projects are missing, certifications are unlisted, or delivery context is vague, the score underweights you. Tighten your profile and rerun.
Emily: "My first profile was too thin. I added two projects and the score moved 12 points on the same role."
How is this different from LinkedIn's skills match?
LinkedIn shows keyword overlap. Judjit reads seniority fit, delivery context, and hard blockers — the signals that actually filter you out.
Will recruiters take a shared verdict seriously?
Only when framed right. The share flow produces a candidate-voiced message — not 'AI gave me 72%' but 'I reviewed the requirements carefully, here is where I am strong and here is the one gap.'
Emily: "The recruiter replied in 48 hours. The message didn't sound AI — it sounded like me."
Is my data stored anywhere?
Job descriptions are not stored. If you save a profile, your CV text and structured profile are retained while the profile exists and can be deleted from your profile settings. No advertising profile. No data resale.
Is Judjit only for Salesforce roles?
Judjit is deepest on Salesforce, but broader platform, product, PMO, QA, and consulting roles are also judged through role family, delivery context, and evidence overlap.
Ready to judge your next role?
Start with the quick verdict. Go deeper in the extension.
No account needed for the demo. Build your profile once when you want live verdicts in the extension.
Fast read
Decide in seconds whether the role deserves deeper effort.
Real layers
Role family, seniority, evidence, and blockers all stay visible.
No fluff
The product tells you what fits, what blocks, and where to clarify next.